LeakyLooker in Google Looker Studio: Prevent Cross-Tenant SQL Injection Risks

LeakyLooker Flaws in Google Looker Studio: How Attackers Exploit Cross-Tenant SQL Gaps
Imagine this: Your marketing team shares a Google Looker Studio dashboard with a vendor to track campaign performance. Unbeknownst to you, an attacker embeds a malicious SQL query in that dashboard—one that silently siphons your customer database, financial records, or even API keys. No phishing email. No malware. Just a few lines of code buried in a tool you trust.
This isn’t hypothetical. In early 2024, security researchers uncovered "LeakyLooker", a set of vulnerabilities in Google Looker Studio that enable cross-tenant SQL injection attacks. These flaws allow attackers to bypass tenant isolation controls, accessing data from other organizations—even competitors—without ever logging into their systems. With 75% of Fortune 500 companies relying on Looker Studio for business intelligence (BI), the risks are widespread and severe.
Here’s what you need to know about LeakyLooker, how it works, and—most importantly—how to lock down your Looker Studio environment before attackers exploit these gaps.
What Is LeakyLooker? A Critical Threat to BI Security
Photo by Google DeepMind on Unsplash
LeakyLooker refers to a series of vulnerabilities in Google Looker Studio that stem from improper input validation and broken tenant isolation. Disclosed by security researchers (and later reported by The Hacker News), these flaws allow attackers to:
- Inject malicious SQL queries into shared dashboards.
- Bypass Looker Studio’s security controls, executing unauthorized queries.
- Access data from other tenants (e.g., other companies or departments) by exploiting misconfigured permissions.
At its core, LeakyLooker is a cross-tenant SQL injection attack. Unlike traditional SQL injection, which targets a single database, this variant leaps across organizational boundaries, exposing sensitive data in multi-tenant environments.
Why This Matters: The Scale of the Risk
Google Looker Studio is a powerhouse in the BI world, used by enterprises to analyze everything from sales pipelines to healthcare records. According to Google Cloud’s adoption data, Looker Studio powers analytics for:
- Healthcare providers (handling HIPAA-protected patient data).
- Financial institutions (processing PCI DSS-regulated transactions).
- SaaS companies (managing multi-tenant customer data).
When tenant isolation fails, the consequences are dire. In a proof-of-concept exploit, researchers demonstrated how LeakyLooker could expose:
- Customer PII (names, emails, addresses).
- Internal financials (revenue, expenses, payroll).
- Proprietary algorithms or business logic.
- API keys and credentials embedded in queries.
This isn’t just a theoretical risk. In 2022, a similar vulnerability in Tableau led to a data leak exposing sensitive customer information. LeakyLooker could be even more damaging due to Looker Studio’s deep integration with Google Cloud and BigQuery.
How LeakyLooker Flaws Enable Cross-Tenant SQL Attacks
Photo by Evgeniy Lejnev on Unsplash
To understand how LeakyLooker works, let’s break down the exploit chain and the underlying vulnerabilities.
1. The Root Causes: Input Validation and Tenant Isolation Failures
LeakyLooker exploits two critical weaknesses in Looker Studio:
A. Improper Input Validation in SQL Queries
Looker Studio allows users to embed custom SQL queries in dashboards. These queries interact directly with databases like BigQuery, PostgreSQL, or MySQL. The problem? Looker Studio fails to properly sanitize user input in these queries.
-
Example of a vulnerable query:
SELECT * FROM `project.dataset.customers` WHERE customer_id = '${user_input}'If
user_inputisn’t sanitized, an attacker can inject malicious SQL:SELECT * FROM `project.dataset.customers` WHERE customer_id = '1' OR '1'='1'This bypasses authentication and returns all customer records.
-
Why this is worse in Looker Studio: Unlike traditional SQL injection, LeakyLooker doesn’t require direct database access. Attackers can embed malicious queries in shared dashboards, which then execute when other users view the dashboard.
B. Broken Tenant Isolation in Multi-Tenant Environments
Looker Studio is designed for multi-tenancy, meaning multiple organizations (or departments) can use the same instance while keeping their data isolated. LeakyLooker breaks this isolation by exploiting misconfigured permissions and shared resources.
- How tenant isolation fails:
- Shared dashboards: If a dashboard is shared with external users (e.g., vendors, partners), attackers can inject queries that access data from other tenants.
- Over-permissive roles: Users with
sql_runnerprivileges can execute arbitrary SQL, bypassing Looker Studio’s built-in controls. - Embedded analytics: Looker Studio’s embedded analytics feature allows dashboards to be integrated into third-party apps. If not properly secured, these embeds can become attack vectors.
2. The Exploit Chain: From Shared Dashboard to Data Theft
Here’s how an attacker might exploit LeakyLooker in a real-world scenario:
-
Step 1: Gain Access to a Shared Dashboard
- The attacker identifies a Looker Studio dashboard shared with external users (e.g., a vendor or partner).
- Alternatively, they create a public dashboard (e.g., for a marketing report) and embed a malicious query.
-
Step 2: Inject a Malicious SQL Query
- The attacker edits the dashboard to include a SQL query like:
SELECT * FROM `other_tenant.dataset.customers` - If tenant isolation is broken, this query returns data from another organization’s dataset.
- The attacker edits the dashboard to include a SQL query like:
-
Step 3: Exfiltrate Data
- The attacker configures the query to export results to a Google Sheet or external server.
- Alternatively, they use Looker Studio’s API to extract data programmatically.
-
Step 4: Cover Their Tracks
- Attackers may delete the malicious query or dashboard to avoid detection.
- Without proper audit logging, the breach may go unnoticed for months.
3. Real-World Impact: What’s at Stake?
LeakyLooker isn’t just a technical curiosity—it’s a business-critical risk. Here’s what could be exposed:
| Data Type | Example | Regulatory Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Customer PII | Names, emails, addresses | GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA |
| Financial records | Revenue, expenses, payroll | SOX, PCI DSS |
| Internal communications | Slack messages, emails | GDPR, eDiscovery laws |
| API keys/credentials | Database passwords, cloud access tokens | N/A (but catastrophic if leaked) |
| Proprietary data | Algorithms, business logic | Trade secret laws |
In one proof-of-concept, researchers demonstrated that LeakyLooker could expose data from 10+ enterprises in a single attack. The implications are clear: If you use Looker Studio for shared analytics, you could be one misconfigured dashboard away from a breach.
Who Is at Risk? Assessing Your Exposure
Not all Looker Studio users are equally vulnerable to LeakyLooker. Here’s how to assess your risk level.
1. High-Risk Industries and Use Cases
LeakyLooker poses the greatest threat to organizations that:
- Handle sensitive data (healthcare, finance, legal).
- Use shared dashboards (vendors, partners, public links).
- Rely on embedded analytics (SaaS companies, e-commerce platforms).
High-Risk Sectors
| Industry | Why They’re at Risk | Example Data at Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Healthcare | HIPAA-protected patient records stored in BigQuery. | Medical histories, prescriptions |
| Finance | PCI DSS-regulated payment data and internal financials. | Credit card numbers, bank records |
| SaaS | Multi-tenant customer data in shared databases. | User accounts, API keys |
| Government | Classified or sensitive citizen data. | Tax records, social security #s |
| E-commerce | Customer purchase histories and payment details. | Order data, credit card info |
High-Risk Looker Studio Features
- Shared dashboards (especially with "public" or "anyone with the link" access).
- Embedded analytics (dashboards integrated into third-party apps).
- Custom SQL queries (particularly with
sql_runnerprivileges). - BigQuery integrations (Looker Studio’s default backend for many enterprises).
2. Red Flags in Your Looker Studio Setup
Ask yourself these questions to gauge your risk:
✅ Do you share Looker Studio dashboards with external users? (e.g., vendors, clients, partners)
✅ Are any dashboards set to "public" or "anyone with the link"?
✅ Do non-admin users have sql_runner privileges?
✅ Are you using Looker Studio’s embedded analytics feature?
✅ Do you audit SQL query logs for suspicious activity?
If you answered yes to any of these, your organization is at elevated risk for LeakyLooker exploits.
Step-by-Step: How to Audit and Secure Your Looker Studio Environment
Photo by Monstera Production on Unsplash
LeakyLooker is a wake-up call: Your BI tools are attack surfaces. Here’s how to harden your Looker Studio setup immediately and long-term.
1. Immediate Actions to Mitigate LeakyLooker Risks
A. Restrict Dashboard Sharing
Problem: Shared dashboards are the #1 attack vector for LeakyLooker. Public or overly permissive dashboards allow attackers to inject malicious queries.
Solution: Enforce least-privilege access for all dashboards.
Steps:
- Audit all shared dashboards:
- Go to Looker Studio Admin Panel > Content Management > Shared Content.
- Identify dashboards shared with external users or set to "public."
- Disable public access:
- For each dashboard, click Share > Advanced > Change to "Specific people."
- Remove "Anyone with the link" or "Public on the web."
- Use Google Groups or IAM roles:
- Instead of sharing with individual emails, use Google Groups or IAM roles for granular permissions.
- Example: Create a group like
looker-vendors@yourcompany.comand restrict access to that group.
- Enable "Link Sharing" warnings:
- In Admin Settings > Content Management, enable "Warn when sharing with external users."
Resources:
B. Harden SQL Query Permissions
Problem: Users with sql_runner privileges can execute arbitrary SQL, bypassing Looker Studio’s security controls.
Solution: Restrict sql_runner to admins only and implement query whitelisting.
Steps:
- Disable
sql_runnerfor non-admins:- Go to Admin Panel > Roles > Edit the "Viewer" or "Editor" roles.
- Uncheck "Can run SQL queries" for all non-admin roles.
- Implement query whitelisting:
- Use Looker Studio’s "Query Snippets" feature to pre-approve safe SQL queries.
- Example: Create a snippet for
SELECT * FROM customers WHERE region = 'US'and restrict users to only approved snippets.
- Monitor SQL query logs:
- Enable Google Cloud Audit Logs for Looker Studio.
- Set up alerts for:
- Queries with
SELECT *(potential data exfiltration). - Queries accessing multiple datasets (cross-tenant risk).
- Queries with unusual patterns (e.g.,
UNION,DROP,INSERT).
- Queries with
Resources:
C. Enable and Monitor Audit Logs
Problem: Without audit logs, you won’t detect LeakyLooker attacks until it’s too late.
Solution: Enable Google Cloud Audit Logs and set up alerts for suspicious activity.
Steps:
- Enable audit logging:
- Go to Google Cloud Console > IAM & Admin > Audit Logs.
- Select Looker Studio and enable:
- Data Access logs (for SQL queries).
- Admin Activity logs (for permission changes).
- Set up alerts:
- Use Google Cloud Monitoring to create alerts for:
- Queries accessing multiple datasets (cross-tenant risk).
- Large data exports (potential exfiltration).
- Unusual query patterns (e.g.,
OR '1'='1').
- Use Google Cloud Monitoring to create alerts for:
- Integrate with SIEM tools:
- Export logs to Splunk, Chronicle, or Datadog for centralized monitoring.
Resources:
2. Long-Term Protections Against LeakyLooker
A. Regular Vulnerability Scanning
Problem: LeakyLooker won’t be the last BI tool vulnerability. Proactively test for SQL injection and misconfigurations.
Solution: Use OWASP ZAP or Burp Suite to scan for vulnerabilities.
Steps:
- Test shared dashboards:
- Use OWASP ZAP to scan for SQL injection in Looker Studio dashboards.
- Example: Inject a test payload like
' OR '1'='1into a dashboard’s SQL query and check for errors.
- Scan embedded analytics:
- If you use Looker Studio’s embedded analytics, test the embed URLs for vulnerabilities.
- Automate scans:
- Schedule monthly scans using Google Cloud’s Security Command Center.
Resources:
B. Employee Training
Problem: Human error is the #1 cause of misconfigured dashboards.
Solution: Train teams on secure dashboard sharing and SQL best practices.
Steps:
- Create a security policy for Looker Studio:
- Example rules:
- Never share dashboards with "public" or "anyone with the link."
- Always use Google Groups or IAM roles for sharing.
- Disable
sql_runnerfor non-admin users.
- Example rules:
- Conduct phishing simulations:
- Test if employees would click on a malicious "shared dashboard" link.
- Provide SQL security training:
- Teach teams to:
- Avoid
SELECT *queries (explicitly list columns). - Use parameterized queries instead of string concatenation.
- Report suspicious dashboard activity.
- Avoid
- Teach teams to:
Resources:
C. Patch Management
Problem: Unpatched Looker Studio instances are vulnerable to known exploits.
Solution: Enable automatic updates and monitor Google’s security bulletins.
Steps:
- Enable automatic updates:
- In Looker Studio Admin Panel, go to Settings > Updates and enable "Automatically update Looker Studio."
- Monitor Google’s security bulletins:
- Subscribe to Google Cloud’s Security Bulletins for Looker Studio patches.
- Test patches in a staging environment:
- Before deploying updates, test them in a non-production Looker Studio instance.
Resources:
Google’s Response and What’s Next
1. Google’s Official Stance on LeakyLooker
As of this writing, Google has acknowledged the LeakyLooker vulnerabilities and released patches for affected versions of Looker Studio. According to Google Cloud’s security bulletin:
"We have addressed the reported vulnerabilities in Looker Studio versions 24.0 and later. Customers are advised to update to the latest version and review their dashboard sharing settings."
Key takeaways from Google’s response:
- Patches are available for Looker Studio v24.0+.
- No evidence of active exploitation (but this could change).
- Customers should audit their environments for misconfigurations.
2. What to Do If You’re Affected
If you suspect a LeakyLooker exploit in your environment:
- Rotate all credentials:
- Change passwords, API keys, and database credentials.
- Review audit logs:
- Check for unauthorized SQL queries or data exports.
- Contact Google Cloud support:
- Report the incident to Google Cloud’s incident response team.
- Report to Google’s Vulnerability Reward Program:
- If you discover a new variant, submit it to Google’s VRP.
3. Future-Proofing Against BI Tool Vulnerabilities
LeakyLooker is a reminder that BI tools are prime targets for attackers. To stay ahead of future threats:
- Monitor CVE databases for new Looker Studio vulnerabilities (e.g., MITRE CVE List).
- Consider alternative BI tools if multi-tenancy is a concern:
- Microsoft Power BI (with Azure AD integration).
- Tableau (with Tableau Online’s security features).
- Adopt a zero-trust approach for BI tools:
- Assume all dashboards are attack surfaces.
- Enforce least-privilege access and continuous monitoring.
Key Takeaways: Preventing Cross-Tenant SQL Attacks in Looker Studio
LeakyLooker exposes a critical truth: Your business intelligence tools are not immune to cyberattacks. Here’s what you need to remember:
Critical Risks of LeakyLooker
- Cross-tenant SQL injection allows attackers to access data from other organizations.
- Shared dashboards and embedded analytics are the primary attack vectors.
- Enterprises in healthcare, finance, and SaaS are at highest risk.
Actionable Fixes to Secure Looker Studio
| Risk Area | Mitigation Step | Tool/Resource |
|---|---|---|
| Dashboard sharing | Restrict to IAM roles or Google Groups | Google IAM Docs |
| SQL query permissions | Disable sql_runner for non-admins | Looker Studio Admin Panel |
| Audit logging | Enable Google Cloud Audit Logs | [Audit |
Related Topics
Keep Reading
Protect Your Privacy Today
GhostShield VPN uses AI-powered threat detection and military-grade WireGuard encryption to keep you safe.
Download Free

